Comments on: Enough is Enough http://www.gpace.org/blog/enough-is-enough/ Together we can demand a clean energy future! Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:01:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: frank http://www.gpace.org/blog/enough-is-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-436 frank Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:19:47 +0000 http://www.gpace.org/?p=932#comment-436 Hi Scott, Not sure if this is your area if not feel free to forward to whomever you think would be most interested. In my opinion it needs following. Basic story - KCC (kansas conservation commission) approved a swd(salt water disposal) well application from a private company Running Foxes Petroleum. When RFP then applied for an injection permit it was refused on grounds that the fluids injected could migrate into the surrounding formation thereby polluting the water supply. RFP are claiming that this won't happen, but a guy from KDHE believes that the formation in question would permit fluid migration. I would hate to think KCC pass this application on the basis a member of their staff mistakenly approved the original permit. It is possible KCC could be open to costs and damages claim if this application is denied. KCC docket reference for this: 09-cons-139-cuic http://www.kcc.state.ks.us/docket/conscal.cgi?history=all Link should take you to docket and below all the pleadings. Final hearing at the moment i believe is 20th November. If you forward, would prefer not have have my email included, many thanks F Hi Scott,

Not sure if this is your area if not feel free to forward to whomever you think would be most interested. In my opinion it needs following.
Basic story – KCC (kansas conservation commission) approved a swd(salt water disposal) well application from a private company Running Foxes Petroleum. When RFP then applied for an injection permit it was refused on grounds that the fluids injected could migrate into the surrounding formation thereby polluting the water supply. RFP are claiming that this won’t happen, but a guy from KDHE believes that the formation in question would permit fluid migration. I would hate to think KCC pass this application on the basis a member of their staff mistakenly approved the original permit. It is possible KCC could be open to costs and damages claim if this application is denied.

KCC docket reference for this: 09-cons-139-cuic
http://www.kcc.state.ks.us/docket/conscal.cgi?history=all

Link should take you to docket and below all the pleadings.
Final hearing at the moment i believe is 20th November.

If you forward, would prefer not have have my email included, many thanks
F

]]>